In the world of virtual technology, simulation software and visualization are indispensable. They allow us to model, analyze, and visualize complex scenarios and environments, whether for educational, design, or research purposes. Often, the end user sees impressive simulation models and thinks that visualization and simulation are the same thing. But the devil is in the details: the main difference is in the underlying technology. Visualization may look good, but it is not sufficient for real engineering and accurate simulation. This article highlights the striking differences between these two technologies using iPhysics and Omniverse from Nvidia.
What is iPhysics?
iPhysics, developed by machineering, is a comprehensive simulation software designed specifically for virtual commissioning. However, with the simulation model as the basis, other topics such as digital twin, factory simulation and factory planning, energy conservation/sustainability, maintenance and AI topics can be easily derived. iPhysics is a key element for engineering to perform detailed analysis, feasibility and testing before the real machines are built. With iPhysics, users can not only simulate the behavior of machines and components under realistic conditions, but also create interactive and immersive simulation experiences that are critical for decision-making and process optimization. It integrates a variety of technologies including CAD design, controller programming including robotics, components, VR/AR and human simulation. Today, it is essential for the smooth operation of automated systems and assembly lines.
Omniverse by Nvidia: A Revolutionary Visualization Platform
The main difference between iPhysics and Omniverse lies in their respective purpose and functionality. While iPhysics focuses on the accurate physics-based simulation of physical processes and the optimization of production workflows, Omniverse focuses on the immersive visualization and representation of virtual worlds. iPhysics is ideal for engineering applications where accurate statements about feasibility, output quantities and possible errors in the process are crucial, especially in the automotive, aerospace, packaging, medical and robotics industries. Omniverse, on the other hand, is perfect for creative industries that require visual representation and interactivity.
Differences and applications
The main difference between iPhysics and Omniverse lies in their respective purpose and functionality. While iPhysics focuses on the accurate physics-based simulation of physical processes and the optimization of production workflows, Omniverse focuses on the immersive visualization and representation of virtual worlds. iPhysics is ideal for engineering applications where accurate statements about feasibility, output quantities and possible errors in the process are crucial, especially in the automotive, aerospace, packaging, medical and robotics industries. Omniverse, on the other hand, is perfect for creative industries that require visual representation and interactivity.
The bottom line
Both simulation software such as iPhysics and visualization platforms such as Nvidia’s Omniverse play an important role in various industries and application areas. While iPhysics is the foundation for innovative engineering, Omniverse provides a powerful visual representation. The choice between these two approaches depends on the specific needs and goals of each project, but both provide powerful tools for modeling and visualizing virtual worlds.

Interested in discovering more about iPhysics? Request a brochure now!
Links to the website
General link:
Learn more about iPhysics and our virtual commissioning solutions on our website: www.machineering.com.
Directly to the product page:
Discover iPhysics – your solution for cloud-based simulation: www.machineering.com/produkte/iphysics.
Contact page:
Do you have any questions? Contact us for more information: www.machineering.com/kontakt.
Overview of VIBN:
Find out more about virtual commissioning and its benefits here: www.machineering.com/vibn.

